Health Content Overview
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 6, Issue 1 (2026)
Geo Res 2026, 6(1): 1001-1011 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2025/10/13 | Accepted: 2025/11/9 | Published: 2025/12/1
Received: 2025/10/13 | Accepted: 2025/11/9 | Published: 2025/12/1
How to cite this article
Karimi S, Nikkho Amiri N, Tabstabaie S M. Foundations of Legislative Ethics from the Perspective of the Objectives of Revelation in al-ShÄá¹ibī’s Thought. Geo Res 2026; 6 (1) :1001-1011
URL: http://daneshafarand.org/article-6-82934-en.html
URL: http://daneshafarand.org/article-6-82934-en.html
Abstract (379 Views)
The ideal legislator in this study is one who upholds propriety, ethics, and the principles of legislation.This study examines the ethical foundations of legislation through ImÄm al-ShÄá¹ibī’s theory of MaqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ«Ê¿ah. By emphasizing the five objectives—preservation of religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property—al-ShÄá¹ibÄ« formulates a moral and rational framework that places legislation in service of the public good. His distinction between devotional acts and transactions, acceptance of analogy in rational matters, and differentiation between Meccan and Medinan revelations establish a dynamic balance between fixed and adaptable SharÄ«Ê¿ah principles. Grounded in the precedence of revelation over reason, al-ShÄá¹ibÄ« views lawmaking as an ethical process bound by divine limits and human welfare. This perspective offers valuable guidance for contemporary Islamic legislation amid technological, social, and moral challenges.
Keywords:
Send email to the article author