Health Content Overview
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 5, Issue 2 (2025)
Geo Res 2025, 5(2): 179-190 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2025/03/11 | Accepted: 2025/04/18 | Published: 2025/05/16
Received: 2025/03/11 | Accepted: 2025/04/18 | Published: 2025/05/16
How to cite this article
Mikaeili M, Jafari Valani A. Criticism of the Duality of Causality-Coincidence and the Solution to the Challenge Arising from it Based on Lewis's Idea of Possible Worlds. Geo Res 2025; 5 (2) :179-190
URL: http://daneshafarand.org/article-6-79947-en.html
URL: http://daneshafarand.org/article-6-79947-en.html
1- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Shahid Motahari University, Tehran Iran
Abstract (1629 Views)
The duality of causality-coincidence is one of the important issues in the history of human thought. The theory of causality in Islamic philosophy was formed on the axis of essential possibility and, after passing from the elementary period, reached its peak in Allameh Tabataba'i. On the other hand, the theory of coincidence reached its pinnacle of development in David Hume. The parties to the dispute argue around this axis whether the preference of existence over non-existence in essences requires a preferred cause or not. Regardless of whether the aforementioned preference is due to a cause or chance, the more important question is whether the occurrence of the aforementioned preference in essence is possible or not. If this preference is impossible, the necessity of a third perspective and a departure from the aforementioned duality is established. This article aims to address the challenge as mentioned earlier and propose a solution based on Lewis's concept of possible worlds. Of course, this perspective has no connection to Lewis's causal perspective.
Keywords:
| | Full-Text (HTML) (75 Views)