Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 1, Issue 3 (2021)
J Clin Care Skill 2021, 1(3): 185-194 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2021/04/1 | Accepted: 2021/07/15 | Published: 2022/02/6
Received: 2021/04/1 | Accepted: 2021/07/15 | Published: 2022/02/6
How to cite this article
Darabi A. Effect of Propositions Division into Actuality, Mental and Factual on the Conditions of Some Syllogisms; Based on the Opinion of Contemporaries. J Clin Care Skill 2021; 1 (3) :185-194
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-51267-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-51267-en.html
Iranian Institute of Philosophy, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (3606 Views)
Throughout the texts of contemporary logicians, it has been explicitly or implicitly stated that the division of propositions into actuality, mental and factual, has no effect on logical syllogisms. In the following text, first, by analyzing the opinions of contemporaries on the division of propositions into actuality, mental and factual, the differences and similarities of the opinions in this regard have been identified. Then we examine the position of the conditional's quantifier and its effect on the conditions of conditional-categorical syllogisms (conjunctive or exceptive) in the opinions of contemporary logicians. In the final step and based on the conditions of conditional-categorical syllogisms (conjunctive or exceptive), we have shown that some of the moods that most contemporaries have declared to be valid have counter-examples, and only with the factual of the categorical premises in all situations and for all samples will result.
Keywords:
Send email to the article author