Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 1, Issue 2 (2021)
Geo Res 2021, 1(2): 155-159 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2020/08/8 | Accepted: 2021/05/29 | Published: 2022/01/22
Received: 2020/08/8 | Accepted: 2021/05/29 | Published: 2022/01/22
How to cite this article
Azimi M. Some Suggestions for the Persian Translation of Deduction/Induction/Abduction. Geo Res 2021; 1 (2) :155-159
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-45025-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-45025-en.html
Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (5083 Views)
'Deduction', 'Induction', and 'Abduction' are among important keywords in contemporary logical and philosophical texts with high frequency, which Iranian translators have translated to “Qias/Estentaj”, “Esteqra”, and “Farzierobayi”. In this article I will show that these translations have proposed with no respect to the context and produce some difficulties. After the description of the difficulties, I will propose some solutions which are based on etymology, context, and neglected capacities of Persian language. On the basis of the solutions, these three terms will be rendered to “Forubord”, “Andarbord”, and “Farabord”.
Send email to the article author