Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 5, Issue 4 (2025)
J Clin Care Skill 2025, 5(4): 663-688 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2025/07/10 | Accepted: 2025/08/20 | Published: 2025/10/12
Received: 2025/07/10 | Accepted: 2025/08/20 | Published: 2025/10/12
How to cite this article
Mehrabadi K, Hasanzadeh Niri M. Validation of Naser Khusraw's Argument Rejecting the Celestial Spheres as Creator. J Clin Care Skill 2025; 5 (4) :663-688
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-82303-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-82303-en.html
1- Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (895 Views)
In the Sixth Discourse of the Zad al-Musafirin, Nasir Khusraw presents his most extensive argument refuting the claim of the materialists that the celestial spheres are the creators of the universe. This argument’s foundation comprises concepts related to the motion of elemental natures and generated beings, as well as the subjugated or dominant nature of celestial spheres and their rotational motion. The findings ultimately reveal that, while Nasir Khusraw’s argument is methodologically sound and formally valid, its premises contain unsubstantiated assumptions and exhibit false analogies. Additionally, the argument includes auxiliary lemmas, some of which hold scholarly value, while others are redundant and could be excised from its core framework.
| | Full-Text (HTML) (10 Views)