Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 2, Issue 4 (2022)
Geo Res 2022, 2(4): 283-296 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2022/08/26 | Accepted: 2022/11/10 | Published: 2022/12/18
Received: 2022/08/26 | Accepted: 2022/11/10 | Published: 2022/12/18
How to cite this article
Hosseinpour G. The Critique of Two Approaches in Linguistics Based on the Theory of Speech Acts. Geo Res 2022; 2 (4) :283-296
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-65048-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-65048-en.html
Islamic Mysticism Department, Research Institute of Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (2957 Views)
The performative deletion analysis approach, does not assume the presence of speakers, hearers, and verbs, but rather the presence of the words I, you, and performative verbs. In the approach of conversational postulates, it is also possible to formalize principles of conversation and show that there are rules in grammar that are dependent on such principles. But according to John Searle, both approaches to the performative deletion analysis and the conversational postulates show a misunderstanding of the place of theory of speech acts in the general narrative of language. Searle's objection to these two approaches is that they both fail to use the sources of current theories of speech acts. Both theories, when confronted with confusing data, assume a solution that requires the introduction of additional and unnecessary components. In each, a correct understanding of the role of speech acts enables us to justify this data without providing these additional and unnecessary components.