Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 6, Issue 2 (2026)
3 2026, 6(2): 1001-1006 |
Back to browse issues page
Request Type:
History
Received: 2026/07/15 | Accepted: 2026/07/1 | Published: 2026/07/1
Received: 2026/07/15 | Accepted: 2026/07/1 | Published: 2026/07/1
How to cite this article
Seyyed Mohammad Ali Hodjati. Aristotelian and Modern Logic Approaches to “Copula”. 3 2026; 6 (2) :1001-1006
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-85694-en.html
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-85694-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abstract (75 Views)
It is well known that in Aristotelian logic, the analysis of a categorical sentence is three-partite, i.e., “subject”, “predicate” and “copula”. In contrast, in modern logic- Fregean and Russellian- it is bipartite. i.e., “function” and “argument”. Although bipartite analysis is sometimes mentioned in some writings of Aristotelian logicians, scrutiny reveals that the copula is considered, even though it is hidden. It seems that this difference in their analysis is rooted in their approaches: the Aristotelian approach is linguistic, and the modern approach is semantical. In sum, we may say that the modern approach is more logical and has some consequences that are ignored in Aristotelian logic.
Keywords: