Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 5, Issue 3 (2025)
3 2025, 5(3): 339-353 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2025/05/7 | Accepted: 2025/06/18 | Published: 2025/09/5
Received: 2025/05/7 | Accepted: 2025/06/18 | Published: 2025/09/5
How to cite this article
Gendeschmin H, Raayat Jahromi M, Heidari M, Rajabi A. The Insufficient Radicality of Marburg Neo-Kantian Philosophical Contributions in Rescuing Metaphysics from Crisis. 3 2025; 5 (3) :339-353
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-80758-en.html
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-80758-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazwin, Iran
2- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (962 Views)
In the second half of the nineteenth century, with the emergence of major crises in multiple dimensions of metaphysics, one of the major efforts to deliver metaphysics from the crisis was the contributions of the Marburg philosophical school, which made methodological efforts from 1870 until the First World War. In this article, after an impartial description of these activities, we will see that from a phenomenological standpoint, their contributions were not as radical, for two reasons: thematic and methodological. According to Husserl, such deliverance lies not in its salvation as Epistemology or the logic of sciences, but in the salvation of the Subject through the understanding and configuration of the three crises of philosophy, science, and the crisis of European man [thematic criticism]. In terms of methodology, the transcendental method of the Marburgians is not progressive like phenomenology, but rather regressive.
Keywords: