Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 5, Issue 2 (2025)
3 2025, 5(2): 239-257 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2025/03/24 | Accepted: 2025/05/19 | Published: 2025/05/29
Received: 2025/03/24 | Accepted: 2025/05/19 | Published: 2025/05/29
How to cite this article
Moosavi Bayegi S, Salami M. Criticism of Qunavi's Negativity Perspective on the Compatibility of the First Emanation and the First Intellect based on Mulla Sadra's Judgment. 3 2025; 5 (2) :239-257
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-80512-en.html
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-80512-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, Razavi University of Islamic Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract (1016 Views)
The issue of how multiplicity emanates from a single source is a central question in Islamic philosophy and mysticism. The principle of the One suggests that a single cause produces only one effect, while multiplicity is self-evident. Peripatetic philosophers addressed this through the emanation of successive intellects, while Illuminationist philosophy introduced the concept of the nearest light. In theoretical mysticism, the First Emanation is seen as the Muhammadan Reality, the first absolute manifestation. Sadr al-Dīn al-Qūnawī views the First Emanation as an absolute, simple reality, with the First Intellect being one of its manifestations. Fanārī critiques the Peripatetics, describing the First Emanation as pure existence without quiddity. Mullā Sadrā reconciles these views through his doctrine of the unity of existence and causal analysis, identifying the First Intellect with the First Emanation. This article examines and compares Qūnawī’s and Mullā Sadrā’s perspectives.
Keywords:
| | Full-Text (HTML) (76 Views)