2
1
3
Literature & Humanities
http://jpt.daneshafarand.org
1
admin
9
10
8
7
14
8888
13
en
jalali
1405
4
1
gregorian
2026
7
1
6
2
online
1
fulltext
fa
Aristotelian and Modern Logic Approaches to “Copula”
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Cambria",serif">In Aristotelian logic, the analysis of a categorical sentence is tripartite, i.e., “subject”, “predicate,” and “copula”. In contrast, in modern logic- Fregean and Russellian- it is bipartite. i.e., “function” and “argument”. Although some writings by Aristotelian logicians mention bipartite analysis, scrutiny reveals that they still consider the copula, even if they hide it. This difference in analysis seems rooted in their approaches: the Aristotelian approach is linguistic, and the modern approach is semantic. In sum, we may say that the modern approach is more logical and has consequences that Aristotelian logic ignores.</span></span></span></span></span>
Copula, Proposition, Bipartite, Tripartite, Function, Argument
243
250
http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/browse.php?a_code=A-10-240-1&slc_lang=fa&sid=6
S.M.A.
Hodjati
1003194753284600387938
1003194753284600387938
Yes
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran