<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://jpt.daneshafarand.org</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1404</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2025</year>
	<month>7</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>5</volume>
<number>4</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>فرونسیس و خودآیینی اراده: مقایسۀ بنیان‌های اخلاقی در فلسفۀ ارسطو و کانت</title_fa>
	<title>Phronesis and the Autonomy of the Will: A Comparative Study of the Moral Foundations in the Philosophy of Aristotle and Kant</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:115%&quot;&gt;&lt;span aptos=&quot;style=font-family:&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;roman=&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;The concept of &lt;i&gt;phronesis&lt;/i&gt; in Aristotle&amp;rsquo;s &lt;i&gt;Nicomachean Ethics&lt;/i&gt;, as practical reason, functions as the connecting link between moral and intellectual virtues and represents wisdom oriented toward judgment in particular situations of human life. In contrast, Kant in the &lt;i&gt;Critique of Practical Reason&lt;/i&gt;, through the principle of autonomy of the will, conceives reason as the source of moral law and the foundation of the subject&amp;rsquo;s self-sufficiency. This article, using a comparative approach, analyzes the conceptual relation between Aristotelian &lt;i&gt;phronesis&lt;/i&gt; and Kantian autonomy, and, in light of Gadamer&amp;rsquo;s hermeneutical philosophy as a complementary theory, examines the possibility of a historical and situational interpretation of practical reason. The research method is qualitative and descriptive&amp;ndash;analytical, based on direct study of the primary texts. It concludes that practical reason, across these three frameworks, evolves from lived wisdom to transcendental law and finally to historical understanding, establishing a dynamic link among Aristotle, Kant, and Gadamer.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>,Phronesis,Autonomy of the Will,Practical Reason,Moral Philosophy,Aristotle,Kant,Gadamer.</keyword>
	<start_page>515</start_page>
	<end_page>530</end_page>
	<web_url>http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-9391&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=6</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Mohsen</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Sarebannejad</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>محسن</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>ساربان نژاد</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600380582</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600380582</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Advanced Studies of Art, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>گروه مطالعات عالی هنر، دانشکده هنرهای تجسمی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
