<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://jpt.daneshafarand.org</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1405</year>
	<month>7</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2026</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<number>3</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>The Development of the Concept of “Eternal Necessity” in Islamic Logic</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&amp;ldquo;Eternal necessity&amp;rdquo; is a key concept in Islamic modal logic, and determining its nature and distinction from &amp;ldquo;absolute necessity&amp;rdquo; has long been a subject of debate among Avicennian logicians. This study, employing an analytical-historical method, examines the views of thinkers such as Avicenna, Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, al-Abharī, and others to explore the relationship between these two forms of necessity and the criteria of eternality.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The findings reveal that disagreements among logicians stem less from fundamental conflicts than from divergent interpretations of Avicenna&amp;rsquo;s expressions&amp;mdash;particularly regarding the relationship between &amp;ldquo;perpetuity,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;necessity,&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;eternality.&amp;rdquo; This study identifies two major approaches within the Avicennian tradition: one that grounds eternality in the essence of the subject, and another that attributes it to the perpetuity of the subject-predicate relationship. This distinction serves as the core of the conceptual evolution of eternal necessity in Islamic logic.</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>1001</start_page>
	<end_page>1016</end_page>
	<web_url>http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/browse.php?a_code=A--240-18&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=6</web_url>


<author_list>
</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
